Podcast: Additional Insured Coverage
By Amanda M. Leffler & Amanda Leffler and Marc Holland on July 31, 2018
The Issue. Owners and upstream contractors often require lower-tier contractors and subcontractors to name them as additional insureds on their CGL policies. Additional insured status allows direct coverage in the event of a third-party claim, but typically only if the claim derives from the acts or omissions of the named insured.
Why It’s Important. Additional insured coverage is one of the most frequently misunderstood areas of construction coverage law. There are multiple types of additional insured endorsements available on the market, and the coverage has narrowed over the last several decades. Savvy contractors draft their contracts to ensure that they are being provided the broadest coverage possible. In addition, while regularly relied upon as evidence of the coverage provided, certificates of insurance do not create coverage and cannot be used to overcome the terms of the policies described in them.
Short Answer. Naming additional insureds requires a separate endorsement to the basic CGL coverage, which can either specifically name the parties that are additional insureds or designate a general category of persons entitled to such coverage under a blanket endorsement. It is important to make sure that the coverage is as broad as you expect—for example, that you require or obtain additional insured coverage for both ongoing and completed operations. It is also important to confirm whether the coverage will apply to upstream parties, including the project owner, and to understand whether the endorsement permits coverage for claims involving the concurrent negligence of the additional insured. Finally, the additional insured should require that certificates of insurance and copies of required endorsements be provided before any work commences and also as a condition precedent to payment.
This Podcast is intended to provide information generally and to identify general legal requirements. It is not intended as a form of, or as a substitute for legal advice. Such advice should always come from in-house or retained counsel. Moreover, if this Podcast in any way seems to contradict the advice of counsel, counsel's opinion should control over anything written herein. No attorney-client relationship is created or implied by this Podcast.
© 2018 Brouse McDowell. All rights reserved.